Every
year, it seems, we encounter in the media a debate about the veracity
of certain dramatic film portrayal of historical events. This year is no
different.
The historical events that inspired the making of Selma
are the marches from Selma to Montgomery, Ala., in
1965, led by Martin Luther King Jr. and how these helped lead to the
passage of the Voting Rights Act of 1965.
But with the release of the film has come much criticism of it, particularly its depiction of President Johnson (LBJ) and his differences with King.
As Elizabeth Drew writes in the New York Review of Books
(Jan. 8): “The film suggests that there was a struggle between King and
Johnson over whether such a bill should be pushed following the passage
of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, signed into law in July of that year.”
She says this is “pure fiction.”
Amy Davidson, writing in the New Yorker,
disagrees. She says the film “is fair to Johnson; the portrayal is
multifaceted and respectful and fully cognizant of his essential
commitment to civil rights.”
Another recent film, American Sniper,
is based on the life of Navy SEAL marksman Chris Kyle. The Clint
Eastwood film depicts his life in “mythical proportions, avoiding more
disturbing aspects of his life,” according to Jake Coyle of the
Associated Press. Meanwhile, the real Kyle boasted of killing looters
after Hurricane Katrina.
To
illustrate the pressure directors may face, Kyle’s father reportedly
told Eastwood before production started: “Disrespect my son and I’ll
unleash hell on you.”
Another recent film, The Imitation Game,
has also come under fire. Based on the life of Alan Turing, a British
mathematician, logician, cryptanalyst and pioneering computer scientist
who led a team of cryptanalysts in breaking the Nazis’ Enigma code
during World War II. Christian Caryl in the New York Review of Books (Dec. 19, 2014) says the film “represents a bizarre departure from the historical record.”
There was an outcry two years ago over Kathryn Bigelow’s Zero Dark Thirty
because it showed that intelligence gathered through torture helped
lead to Osama bin Laden’s capture. Senators Diane Feinstein and John
McCain claimed the film was “perpetuating the myth that torture is
effective” and told the film’s makers they had “a social and moral
obligation to get the facts right.”
Bigelow responded, “We’re not making documentaries.
Drew takes a different view. “No one is asking for a documentary,” she writes. However, “our
history belongs to all of us, and major events shouldn’t be the
playthings of moviemakers to boost their box-office earnings.”
Ava DuVernay, who directed Selma,
says the concern is not box-office earnings but the director’s artistic
vision. “You can look at everything with a lens of scrutiny and miss
the greater truth that the artists are trying to share,” she said in an
interview.
Even
historians have to condense and simplify their telling of events. You
just can’t include everything and every nuance. And directors of
dramatic films are interested in a dramatic story that fits their larger
vision.
That doesn’t excuse portraying falsehood. It hurts the film’s credibility when such inaccuracies are part of it.
Maybe that’s why eight of my top 10 films of 2014 don’t claim to be based on a “true story.”