Why are so many U.S. viewers so
enamored with Downton Abbey, which ended its third season on PBS last Sunday?
This British period drama television series, created by
Julian Fellowes, is set in a fictional Yorkshire country estate of Downton
Abbey and depicts the aristocratic Crawley family and their servants in the
post-Edwardian era.
Like the popular series Upstairs Downstairs, which aired on
PBS over five seasons, 1971-75, Downton dramatizes the lives of the
aristocratic family and of their servants, as well as their interactions.
Class is entrenched in British life, set according to what
family one is born into, while Americans like to deny its reality, believing
anyone can climb the ladder of success. Downton accentuates this difference at
times with the presence of Cora, Countess of Grantham, an American heiress
married to Robert, Earl of Grantham, whose estate is facing financial problems
in season three.
Perhaps part of the appeal of Downton is this strange
interplay of characters from the upper and lower classes.
But no, that’s true of just about every British product on
TV. And besides, the show is equally popular in Great Britain. In fact, it has
become one of the most widely watched television shows in the world.
Critics, while lauding the show’s acting, have not been
unanimous in their accolades. In “Brideshead Regurgitated” (The Atlantic,
January/February), James Parker calls Downton a “ludicrously popular
aristosoap” and says its motto might be: “Footmen have feelings, too.”
Parker goes on to call Downton “a harmless, anachronistic
masque of manners, in which the players keep obediently to their roles and
thereby gratify the innate conservatism of the audience.”
Others include Simon Schama, the British historian, who
complained in Time that Downton misrepresented how awful World War I was, along
with other historical inaccuracies.
But Downton is not a documentary; it is, as Parker says, a
soap opera. Fellowes has created
characters that, on the one hand, tend to be all good, like Anna (a housemaid)
or Bates (a valet) or Mrs. Hughes (a housekeeper), or pretty bad, like Thomas
(a footman) or O’Brien (a lady’s maid). On the other hand, he introduces some
changes in certain characters as they face adversity and respond in either
heroic or tragic ways.
The fact is, audiences love characters they can boo and
those they can cheer. And while we’re being manipulated by melodrama, we often
don’t care.
Mondays have found Facebook posts commenting on the previous
night’s episode. The setting and the travails of these fictional characters
from another era that is also quite fictional, despite its occasional
historical signposts, take us away from our mundane or less interesting lives
for a moment each week.
That’s what entertainment does, whether it’s a PBS soap or a
football game or a concert or a murder mystery. Humans throughout history have
sought diversions from their day-to-day lives.
Are such diversions bad? Not as long as we don’t accept them
as some kind of Truth (with a capital T).
No comments:
Post a Comment